line |
stmt |
bran |
cond |
sub |
pod |
time |
code |
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head1 NAME |
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scope::Cleanup - reliably run code upon exit of dynamic scope |
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head1 SYNOPSIS |
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
use Scope::Cleanup qw(establish_cleanup); |
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
establish_cleanup sub { ... }; |
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
establish_cleanup \&do_cleanup; |
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
establish_cleanup $cleanup_code_ref; |
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head1 DESCRIPTION |
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This module provides a facility for automatically running cleanup code |
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
when exiting a dynamic scope. The cleanup code is attached to the stack |
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
frame directly, rather than being attached to an object that must then |
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
be managed separately. The cleanup code reliably runs when the stack |
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
frame unwinds, regardless of the reason for unwinding: it may be a normal |
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return, exception throwing, program exit, or any kind of non-local return. |
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cleanup code established through this module has direct access to Perl's |
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dynamic state. It can do things such as C to change the course of |
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
execution outside the cleanup. |
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head1 STACK UNWINDING |
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While returning (locally or non-locally) to an outer stack frame, |
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
things must be done automatically at each stage, depending on the |
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
circumstances in which the stack frames were created. Variables that |
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
were given dynamically-local values (with C) are restored to |
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
their previous values. Objects used by the stack frames, that are |
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not referenced elsewhere, are destroyed. These things happen in the |
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reverse of the order in which their stack frames were established. |
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is referred to as "unwinding the stack". |
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is sometimes desired to establish some code that will be automatically |
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
executed during unwinding, for example to release resources that are not |
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reified as objects. A common way of doing this in Perl, implemented |
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in the L module, is to create a blessed object whose C |
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
method will perform the desired action, and hold a reference to it in |
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a lexical variable. If the object is not otherwise touched, then upon |
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unwinding its destructor will fire. This isn't really a clean approach |
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for arbitrary cleanup code, which is more concerned with its specific |
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stack frame than with a specific object. This module provides a better |
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
way to run arbitrary cleanup code, registering code directly to run |
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
during unwinding, without any intermediation. |
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An object destructor is run inside an implicit C block. This |
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
prevents it from making any non-local control transfer outside the |
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
confines of the destructor. This is an appropriate limitation to put |
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on object destructors, but is not so appropriate for code associated |
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with a specific stack frame. Code run directly is not so wrapped, and |
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
is free to make non-local control transfers. However, when the stack |
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unwinding is due to one of Perl's native mechanisms, critical parts of |
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the stack can be seen in an inconsistent state, which interferes with some |
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
non-local transfers that ought to be valid. This is because Perl doesn't |
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect arbitrary code to run without an C block during unwinding. |
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The unwinding performed by L's non-local control transfers |
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
is better behaved. |
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head1 VULNERABLE STATE VARIABLES |
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cleanup code must be especially careful about certain global state |
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
variables. The five variables C<$.>, C<$@>, C<$!>, C<$^E>, and C<$?> |
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
are all set as a side effect by relevant operations, indicating part of |
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the result of that operation. They are expected to be examined by code |
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
run subsequently, before the next operation relevant to the variable |
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
overwrites it. (For C<$.> the value itself does not behave like this, |
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
because that is actually part of an I/O handle's persistent state. |
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, the choice of which I/O handle the variable looks at is such |
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
temporary status.) |
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If some code that incidentally overwrites one of the status variables |
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
is somehow executed between a relevant operation and the code that |
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expected to read the variable, then the wrong value will be read. |
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The most serious type of problem occurs with C setting C<$@>, |
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where reading the correct value from C<$@> is almost always critical to |
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the next bit of program logic. Also, prior to Perl 5.13.1, C is |
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
much more vulnerable to having the variable clobbered than are operations |
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
involving the other variables. When Cing on an older Perl, C<$@> |
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gets set first, then the stack unwinds to the eval frame, and only |
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
then does C complete. So there is a large window of opportunity |
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
during unwinding for C<$@> to lose the exception that is being thrown. |
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From Perl 5.13.1 onwards that particular vulnerability has been fixed, |
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
but C<$@> can still potentially be clobbered after C completes. |
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are three main ways that lexically remote code could get run |
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unexpectedly: signal handlers, object destructors, and scope cleanup code. |
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signal handlers can be run at essentially any time. Not knowing what |
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
code they might be interrupting, it is vital that they avoid changing |
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
any of the status variables. It must also be careful not to C |
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or otherwise exit non-locally. (Though it can validly use exceptions |
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
internally.) Object destructors are a bit more predictable, and in fact |
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
predictable destruction time is often used as a hack to achieve a scope |
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cleanup effect, but basically destructors can run at nearly any time. |
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Destructors should also, therefore, always avoid changing any of the |
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
status variables. |
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scope cleanup code is in a different position. Because it is guaranteed |
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to run when a particular scope exits, the code around that scope may be |
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expecting the effects of the cleanup code. That might include performing |
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
operations that set status variables, for code running just outside the |
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
scope to read. It is permitted to do this sort of thing, but liable to |
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
be confusing, so it is recommended that you not pass information out of |
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cleanup code in this way. (You should read the status variable inside the |
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cleanup code, and put the result in an ordinary well-behaved variable.) |
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cleanup code might also intentionally C or perform another kind of |
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
non-local control transfer. |
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where automatically-run code does not intend to set the global status |
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
variables for other code to read, it should consistently localise them, |
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with "C". This should be done as early as |
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
possible in the signal handler, destructor, or cleanup function. |
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a scope cleanup function intends to exit by C, there is a |
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
complication. Prior to Perl 5.13.1, localising C<$@> prevents the C |
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from working normally: the restoration of the previous value will itself |
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
clobber C<$@> for the purposes of that C. (This is due to C<$@> |
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
being set early in the C, as described above.) In this case, the |
121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cleanup function must not localise C<$@>, and must make other arrangements |
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to avoid clobbering C<$@> in the event that it does not exit by C. |
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is ongoing discussion about changing some of the Perl core's |
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
semantics, to make the above more tractable. The changes to C<$@> |
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
behaviour in Perl 5.13.1 were a result of these concerns, and further |
127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
change is likely. |
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=cut |
130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
package Scope::Cleanup; |
132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133
|
14
|
|
|
14
|
|
1013945
|
{ use 5.008001; } |
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
134
|
14
|
|
|
14
|
|
95
|
use warnings; |
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
135
|
14
|
|
|
14
|
|
89
|
use strict; |
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
544
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137
|
14
|
|
|
14
|
|
8875
|
use Devel::CallChecker 0.003 (); |
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
24209
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
651
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
our $VERSION = "0.003"; |
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
14
|
|
|
14
|
|
115
|
use parent "Exporter"; |
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
our @EXPORT_OK = qw(establish_cleanup); |
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
require XSLoader; |
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XSLoader::load(__PACKAGE__, $VERSION); |
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head1 OPERATORS |
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These operators should be used through bareword function call syntax, |
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as if they were functions. However, they cannot otherwise be called as |
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
functions in the normal manner. Attempting to take a reference to them |
152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
will result in a code reference that does not have any of the behaviour |
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
described. |
154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=over |
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=item establish_cleanup(CLEANUP_CODE) |
158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I must be a reference to a subroutine. A cleanup handler |
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
is established, such that the referenced subroutine will be called during |
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unwinding of the current stack frame. |
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=back |
164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head1 SEE ALSO |
166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L, |
168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L |
169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head1 AUTHOR |
171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew Main (Zefram) |
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head1 COPYRIGHT |
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright (C) 2010, 2012, 2017 Andrew Main (Zefram) |
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head1 LICENSE |
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This module is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it |
181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
under the same terms as Perl itself. |
182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=cut |
184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1; |